“What does she look like?”
The question stymied me. I mean, it
shouldn’t have – it was innocent enough. A moment ago I’d been
nattering on enthusiastically about a character I was developing in one
of my scripts, and it wasn’t until the question was put so baldly that I
realized I didn’t have the faintest idea what she looked like.
I could, however, hear her voice clearly
– her cadence, her tone, her verbal tics. I may not be much of a visual
thinker, but I’m obsessive about dialogue. I think this has mostly
served me well, as a playwright who works with some fairly
expressionistic material. Over the past twenty years, I’ve had the
privilege of seeing many of my characters animated by many different
bodies, of all shades and shapes.
The joy of show business is
that it’s a uniquely collaborative form. Now, when I pick up one of my
older scripts, I see many faces.
---
In what feels like a
lifetime ago, I was director of a mime troupe for a youth theatre. After
concluding our last project, I asked them what they wanted to work on
next. The two answers were “Norse mythology!” and “Commedia dell’arte!”,
with some wit immediately suggesting “Why not both?”
I laughed, and then chewed on it. Why not both?
Maybe it was nothing more than a kind of apophenia, but the more that I
looked at it, the more it made sense to me. Farcical exploits revolving
around an amoral trickster? Larger-than-life characters both immune to
harm and incapable of growth? So we improvised, and I spitballed
character exercises, and we hammered together some wordless physical
comedy.
Years later, when I was setting out on my own and digging
through old projects, it stood out as a potentially fruitful premise.
For months I pored over the Eddas, scribbling down lyrics and
one-liners. And after many more months of blind mailouts, a response to
one of my despairing posts to rec.arts.theatre.plays (it was 2003, so
think Reddit before Reddit, kids) mentioned the Fringe.
There
followed a musical revue, a touring one-act, and many, many open-mics.
My point is that this process was, at every step, collaborative. Actors
ad-libbed jokes, and I reworked them into the text. Audiences told us
what was and what most definitely was not working.
Working on the
script again after so much time has felt, oddly, less like rewriting
and more like a collaboration with a version of myself that no longer
exists. I am, by nearly any definition, a better writer now than I was
then. But I know too much – I reject jokes out of hand because of course that won’t work.
There’s something a little melancholy about looking back at a giddy new
playwright who will throw out gag after gag without hesitation.
This
was my journeyman project. While I’d been writing plays for theatres on
commission for years, this was the first production over which I had
creative control. This was the first space I had to give these voices,
and faces, free rein.
It feels appropriate. The script contains
in microcosm many of the defining features of what would become Maximum
Verbosity: the dense language; deconstruction of a medieval text; the
casual mixture of comedy and horror; a keen interest in the problem of
evil; an admiration for and dread of the harsh face of moral freedom;
plus, y’know, lots of dick and fart jokes. Probably more than I would
include now, but, hey, I was twenty, and I’d been writing children’s
theatre for years. Cut the kid a break.
---
I pick up the
script now and I see many faces, and hear many voices. I take pride in
the work that I’ve done. I remember the long hours and the fights and
frustration. But I also remember that I didn’t do any of it alone.
We
live in a world today that I don’t think that younger version of me
could have fully conceived of – a world in which everyone has a
platform. It’s both wonderful, and horrifying. And I’d say that its
existence makes live theatre more precious than ever. Sure, the medium
is dying. It was dying then, too. I expect it’ll still be dying twenty
years from now, or two hundred years from now. Because if the theatre
loves anything, it’s a long fucking death scene.
Taking
the words that were once inside my head; hearing and seeing them
reinterpreted by so many artists of so many different disciplines;
walking into a room full of strangers, and sharing them; I mean,
sometimes I have to step back and say, like, what percentage of the population of the planet gets to have this experience?
Thank
you for coming tonight, and thank you for listening. I’m an
individualist (neither unapologetic nor rugged), and I don’t believe
that it’s prudent for me to speak for anybody else. But having the
opportunity to share these words with you – heady and hacky, profane or
profound - for the past twenty years - has been the honor of my life.
Wednesday, May 31, 2023
The Douchebag With a Thousand Faces
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)